I’ve recently become a “L.A.B.” rat. No, I don’t mean I bought a white coat and a chemistry set. I mean I’ve gone all in on L.A.B. Golf putters and their Lie Angle Balanced technology (L.A.B. Get it?). I’d tried a couple models but I wasn’t a huge fan of the feel and didn’t have that putting epiphany some of my friends had. So I shelved them in favor of less weird-looking flatsticks. Then came the OZ.1i and I was intrigued, to say the least. One remote fitting and a dent to the wallet and I was the proud owner of a TPT-shafted charcoal OZ.1i.
It took a little bit of getting used to, I grant you. L.A.B. calls it a “torque hangover” and, believe me, some hangovers are worse than others. I’d been on a decade-long torque bender and it took some effort via a lot of thumbless drills to get clean. That hard work is behind me and I’m seeing quite a few more putts go in this year than last.
The dilemma
There’s just one problem in this burgeoning love story. Like most golf equipment junkies, I’ve got a bit of a wandering eye. What I don’t have is an unlimited budget. Having sunk considerable cheddar into the OZ purchase, I was now insatiably curious about the rest of the L.A.B. lineup (even the weird-looking ones). I had a dilemma.
A little bit about me: I putt “heads up,” meaning I’m looking at the target, not the ball, when I make my stroke. If you’re at all curious about that, fire up Google and search “Sasho MacKenzie” and “heads up putting.” You’ll find plenty of material from perhaps the smartest man in golf extolling the virtues of this method. The point is that it seems to me that if I’m not going look at the ball when I putt, I should probably emphasize forgiveness in my choice of putters.
Peruse the L.A.B. lineup and you’ll find the OZ is plenty forgiving, but not the most forgiving. That honor goes to the flagship DF 2.1. You know, the one that looks like a branding iron.





